Partou BSO Jan Muschlaan 24

Shortcomings

• Following the inspection visit, the provider drew up an action plan (29 August 2026) with concrete measures, deadlines, and responsibilities
• The provider has implemented various improvement measures, including a daily hygiene and safety checklist, and has ordered play materials

Violations

• The location is insufficiently clean and hygienic: group rooms and sanitary facilities contain visible dust, dirt, stains, and other contaminants
• There are traces of pollution on walls, cabinets, furniture, and windows that do not appear to be recent
• The sink in a group room was contaminated with dried paint residue
• Used drinking cups, wet used washcloths, and toilet rolls were on the floor in the toilet area
• Staff do not act in accordance with the safety and health policy in daily practice
• The safety and health policy is insufficiently up to date; signals and shortcomings do not lead to demonstrable adjustments to work agreements, checks, or risk assessments
• Risks are incorrectly assessed or insufficiently described (mouse infestation, hygiene, risk of infection)
• Insufficiently concrete action plan with measures, responsibilities, deadlines, and evaluation up to the time of inspection

Summary

The Municipal Health Service (GGD) inspection report of 11 August 2026 describes a follow-up investigation at Partou BSO Jan Muschlaan 24 in Utrecht, an after-school care (BSO) with 106 places. This investigation followed an administrative order with penalty payment of 30 June 2026, which was imposed after serious violations during an earlier inspection on 18 February 2026. At that time, an active mouse infestation was found with mouse droppings in group rooms, kitchens, and storage areas, resulting in a closure order. Despite recovery measures and re-inspections, the current investigation revealed that structural shortcomings in hygiene and cleanliness persist. The group rooms and sanitary facilities were insufficiently clean, with visible dust, dirt, stains, polluted walls, dusty cabinets, and unhygienic toilet areas. The contamination was spread across multiple rooms and appeared to be present before the start of the care day. The provider had not implemented sufficiently visible and sustainable improvements in daily practice and in the safety and health policy.